louisvuittonbags

The goal is to fight litter and lighten the load on landfills by getting shoppers to use reusable fabric bags. Those who don’t could buy paper bags for a nickel or more.

“I think the proliferation of plastic bags is unnecessary, and it’s a pollutant, an urban tumbleweed,” Assemblywoman Julia Brownley, D-Santa Monica, said of the lightweight bags that can litter yards and clog waterways.

Californians use about 19 billion plastic bags per year, about 552 bags apiece, according to a legislative committee analysis of Brownley’s proposal, Assembly Bill 1998.

Tim Shestek of the American Chemistry Council said the plastic bag industry would rather pay to bolster recycling programs than ban plastic bags. He said that with California’s economy struggling, it makes no sense to jeopardize about 500 plastic-bag manufacturing jobs and to promote paper bags that produce more greenhouse gas during their life cycle than plastic bags do.

“We frankly think this is a dangerous precedent for the state to be setting,” Shestek said.

The crackdown on disposable bags would cost an estimated $1.5 million the first year and $1 million annually to launch, administer and

Advertisement

enforce, payable from fees on makers of reusable bags.

AB 1998 was approved by the Assembly this month on a party-line vote, 42-27, with Republicans opposed; it is pending in the Senate. Schwarzenegger praised the bill when it cleared the lower house, calling it “a great victory for our environment.”

Shoppers outside a West Sacramento Raley’s grocery store had mixed feelings.

Tony Bobbitt, 23, said his family occasionally uses plastic grocery bags as trash-can liners, but usually they just get discarded. “Personally, I think it’s a good idea,” he said. “Plastic, paper — it’s a lot of waste.”

Brian Snider, 48, turned thumbs down. “They’re charging for everything, the government,” he said. “It’s getting worse than a bank.”

No state has restricted disposable bags, but some cities and other nations have.

Shoppers in Ireland pay 33 cents per plastic bag. San Francisco’s supermarkets and pharmacies are prohibited from providing plastic bags. And in Washington, D.C., shoppers pay a 5-cent surcharge on paper and plastic bags at grocery and retail stores.

The California Grocers Association supports AB 1998 because it would set a statewide standard — pre-empting local ordinances — and would apply equally to grocers of all sizes, spokesman Dave Heylen said.

Shoppers can buy reusable fabric bags now for about $1, perhaps more, depending on size and fabric.

Tens of thousands of plastic bags were among the 1.4 million pounds of debris retrieved during an annual cleanup of California beaches and waterways last year, said Eben Schwartz, outreach manager for the California Coastal Commission. An estimated 60 percent to 80 percent of all marine debris is plastic, which can harm wildlife if they eat it or get tangled in it.

“When those bags are floating around in the marine environment, they tend to mimic food,” said Mark Murray of Californians Against Waste. “So marine life, whether it’s birds or sea turtles, will consume the bags thinking they’re prey.”

Jon Coupal of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association said the bill would have little effect on ocean debris. Other states and nations would not be affected by the ban, nor would California’s fast-food restaurants, department stores or other retail outlets that routinely use such bags.

“It’s simply another example of nanny government overreaching,” Coupal said.

Brownley said existing recycling programs have not fared well, attracting only a tiny percentage of plastic bags, so expanding them is impractical. Shoppers could avoid the proposed nickel-a-bag charge simply by keeping a reusable bag, she said.

Opponents counter with a study by university researchers, funded by the American Chemistry Council, which suggests that reusable bags pose health risks. Ninety-seven percent of reusable bag users fail to wash them, and 51 percent of bags carried food-borne bacteria, the study found.